Länderberichte GROSSBRITANNIEN:

Hier findet Ihr "europaweite" Links, Beiträge und Infos - Sexarbeit betreffend. Die Themen sind weitgehend nach Ländern aufgeteilt.
Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Künstler unterstützen Sexworker

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »

Author Sebastian Horsley at the Sex Workers demonstration
at Eros Fountain, Piccadilly Circus, London - 31. März 2009



[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQHAmbhcemo[/youtube]


Links zu mehr Bildern Sex Worker Demo:
http://sexworker.at/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=53166#53166




Mehr von ihm >> Callboys:
The Sebastian Horsley Guide to Whoring :eusa_clap
http://sexworker.at/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=53936#53936

Sex Worker Open University (SWOU) war ein Erfolg:
viewtopic.php?p=53699#53699





.
Zuletzt geändert von Marc of Frankfurt am 18.04.2009, 20:55, insgesamt 2-mal geändert.

Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Unterm roten Schirm beschützt

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »

Fortsetzung - Interviews von der Sexworker-Demo:

Sex workers protest Dr Belinda Brooks-Gordon at sex worker demo at Eros



Speaking out against the harm the Policing and Crime Bill will cause if passed through Parliament

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kybqlcH4P70[/youtube]



Uni-Homepage:
Dr Belinda BROOKS-GORDON C. Psychol. B.Sc. (Mddx), M.Phil., Ph.D. (Cantab).
Reader in Psychology and Social Policy
@ Birkbeck University of London, School of Psychology
http://www.bbk.ac.uk/psyc/staff/academic/bbrooks-gordon





.

Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Zur Menschenhandelsdebatte

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »

UK Home Affairs Committee report on Trafficking


PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY INTO "MODERN SLAVE TRADE" PAINTS PICTURE OF POOR
UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROBLEM, PATCHY ENFORCEMENT AND LITTLE PROTECTION FOR
VICTIMS



Home Affairs Committee
News Release
Committee Office, House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
Media Enquiries: Jessica Bridges Palmer 020 7219 0724 / 07917 488 447

Attn: News Desks, Political, Home Affairs Correspondents

Embargo: Not for print, broadcast or online publication in before 00.01
Thursday 14 May 2009



The Home Affairs Committee's publishes its report on human trafficking
today, Thursday 14 May 2009, to coincide with a conference hosted by the
Committee that brings together the Chairs of the relevant Committees
from across Europe.

Keith Vaz MP, Chair of the Committee, said: "Unfortunately, our inquiry
has painted a rather grim picture of a lack of understanding of, and
therefore ability to deal with, the problem of human trafficking, among
the various authorities in the UK and other EU countries. We need to be
clear - this is not about "people smuggling": illegally bringing willing
people into the UK. This is not immigration crime and cannot be dealt
with as such
. What we are seeing is in effect a resurgence of a type of
slave trade, yet we have no good information on the scale of the
problem, enforcement is patchy, prosecution rates are low and there is
little protection for victims.

"A number of agencies in the UK - for example, the Metropolitan Police
Human Trafficking Unit and the Gangmasters Licensing Authority - are
recognised internationally as examples of best practice in detecting
and rescuing victims, but we need to greatly improve our understanding
of the problem. We need reliable information about the scale of the
problem to be able to assign resources in the proper direction, and
crucially we need much better training for the agencies and officials
who deal with trafficking, both on the front line and in the criminal
justice and immigration systems."

"We are disappointed that not all Member States are co-operating as
fully with Europol as they could, and that not all EU Member States have
taken practical measures to combat trafficking. However, we are today
bringing together a "coalition of the willing", representatives of
agencies and Committees in other EU countries, to discuss approaches and
best practice in dealing with this appalling crime."
The Committee says one of the biggest problems facing attempts to tackle
trafficking is the lack of any serious, current estimates of the scale
of the "trade in people". At a conservative estimate, there are at least
5,000 trafficking victims in the UK, although some estimates *[INTERESTING
THEY DON'T SAY IT'S A HOME OFFICE ESTIMATE OR ANYTHING ABOUT THE CALCULATION
METHOD] *say there
are at least 4,000 trafficked women working in the sex industry alone.
The estimates of the number of people trafficked into the EU each year
ranges from 100,000 to 800,000.

The Committee expresses its disappointment that the UKHTC has not made
more progress at developing estimates of the scale of the problem, one
of the main tasks for which it was established. Without reasonable
estimates of the scale of the problem, it is impossible to gauge what
support services are needed for victims. Currently there is long-term
government funding for just 35 places for victims in safe accommodation.
*Trafficking - which must be distinguished from people smuggling - takes
several forms. According to Europol the most prevalent form of
trafficking in the EU was of young women and children for sexual
exploitation,* and the trafficking of children to commit street crimes
(e.g. begging) was a 'big issue'. ECPAT UK also listed cannabis
cultivation, forced marriage and benefit fraud as purposes for which
children were trafficked.

About 60% of suspected child victims in local authority care go missing
and are not subsequently found. Evidence from the Local Government
Association emphasised the degree of confusion still surrounding the
question of how to detect child victims of trafficking, and the
Committee was particularly alarmed by accounts that traffickers may be,
in effect, using the "care home system for vulnerable children as
holding pens for their victims until they are ready to pick them up".
Adults might be trafficked to commit crimes such as shoplifting,
pick-pocketing and the sale of pirate CDs and DVDs on the street, or
into legal employment such as construction, agriculture and food
production, and care/nursing. The exploitation of migrant domestic
workers became so notorious that in 1998 the Government introduced
special visas for them.

The Committee considered measures that could be taken to reduce demand
for forced labour and sexual exploitation. *Shortly before it gave
evidence to the Committee, the newspaper publisher, Newsquest, announced
it intended to drop all advertisements for 'adult entertainment' from
its papers throughout the UK. The Committee also considered the proposal
(included in the current Police and Crime Bill) to make sexual
intercourse with a trafficked person a strict liability offence, and
noted the view of senior policemen that this would be very difficult to
enforce.*

*The Committee says that the difficulty in getting prosecutions for
trafficking has led to the "Al Capone" approach, where suspected
traffickers are charged for lesser crimes such as "living on immoral
earnings". However, the problem with this approach is that the lesser
sentences these crimes attract may not allow time even for their
victims' immigration status to be determined, let alone for them to
safely re-establish her/himself in the UK or their home country.*
The Committee identifies "major gaps in awareness and training" within
the UK Border Agency, despite the best efforts of some staff, which it
says "must be addressed by a greater emphasis on the excellent guidance
already available". It was also "disturbed to hear anecdotal evidence of
a lack of awareness about trafficking and its effect on victims among
immigration judges. It seems that there is a pressing need for training
of judges, too."

In the area of "legal" employment, the Committee says that outside the
Gangmasters Licensing Authority's sectors, enforcement is at best patchy
and at worst non-existent. The Committee recommends that that the
construction industry should be the first focus and if, after two years,
the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate has not succeeded in
reducing abuse, then the remit of the Gangmasters Licensing Authority
should be extended to cover construction.

The Committee noted the reduction in government funding to the Met's
Human Trafficking Unit, and recommended that, far from being run down,
the unit should be sustained until the best practice it represented was
embedded throughout the police service in the UK. /ENDS

Notes to editors:
1. The Committee's one day conference, to be held at Westminster,
is focusing on how Parliamentarians could encourage greater
international co-operation and co-ordination in tackling what is mainly
a transinational crime. There will be a keynote address by the Home
Secretary, and more than 20 MPs from various European countries, plus
police representatives, NGOs and expert groups will take part. It is
hoped that the Parliamentarians will issue a declaration of conclusions
and recommendations at the end of the meeting.
2. The conference is by invitation only - Keith Vaz MP will
be available mid-day for comment.
3. The Committee intends to hold a further evidence session
on the subject of the disappearance of unaccompanied asylum-seeking
children from children's homes, later this year
The Committee membership is as follows:

Rt Hon Keith Vaz (Chairman) (Lab) (Leicester East)
Tom Brake (Lib Dem) (Carshalton & Wallington) Margaret Moran
(Lab) (Luton South)
Ms Karen Buck (Lab) (Regent's Park & Kensington North) Mr Gwyn Prosser
(Lab) (Dover)
Mr James Clappison (Con) (Hertsmere) Bob Russell (Lib
Dem) (Colchester)
Mrs Ann Cryer (Lab) (Keighley) Martin Salter
(Lab) (Reading West)
Mr David T. C. Davies (Con) (Monmouth) Mr Gary Streeter
(Con) (South West Devon)
Mrs Janet Dean (Lab) (Burton) Mr David Winnick
(Lab) (Walsall North)
Patrick Mercer (Con) (Newark)

FURTHER INFORMATION:
Media Enquiries: Jessica Bridges Palmer, Tel 020 7219 0724, email:
bridgespalmerj@parliament.uk
Specific Committee Information: Tel 020 7219 3276, email:
homeaffcom@parliament.uk
Committee Website:
www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom
www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committ ... s_committe
e.cfm

Watch committees and parliamentary debates online:
www.parliamentlive.tv

Publications / Reports / Reference Material: Copies of all select
committee reports are available from the Parliamentary Bookshop (12
Bridge St, Westminster, 020 7219 3890) or the Stationery Office (0845
7023474). Committee reports, press releases, evidence transcripts,
Bills; research papers, a directory of MPs, plus Hansard (from 8am
daily) and much more, can be found on
www.parliament.uk



Two part report "The Trade in Human Beings: Human Trafficking in the UK"
available at
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhaff.htm





.

Benutzeravatar
Ariane
PlatinStern
PlatinStern
Beiträge: 1330
Registriert: 14.03.2008, 12:01
Wohnort: Berlin
Ich bin: ehemalige SexarbeiterIn

RE: Länderberichte GROSSBRITANNIEN:

Beitrag von Ariane »

Das Gesetz wurde zwischenzeitlich nachgebessert, aber unzureichend, die dritte Lesung hat am Dienstag dazu stattgefunden. Die Queen höchstselbst hat sich ja für das Gesetz wohlwollend ausgesprochen. Ich sehe eher schwarz, was die Zukunft betrifft und das heisst die Kriminalisierung von Kunden (nach Nachbesserung: ... die mit Zwangsprostitutierten verkehren, im Wortlaut: "subjected to force") und eine weitführende Viktimisierung von Sexworkern, Kriminalisierung von Agenturinhabern etc. pp. Es finden jetzt schon massenhaft Razzien statt, in einschlägigen Tagesadressen, Parlours ...
Das Ziel des Gesetzes war ja ursprünglich das Zurückdrängen von Menschenhandel und Zwangsprostitution, die in Grossbritannien ungeheure Ausmasse angenommen haben, letztendlich wird sich wohl auch hier ein abolutionistisches Verbotsregime durchsetzen, das bedeutet, daß sich die Szene weiter in den Untergrund verzieht, ich kann es nicht oft genug sagen, unter noch prekäreren Verhältnissen arbeiten werden, was eine deutlich höhere Verwundbarkeit einschliesst bzw. durch das neue Gesetz in Kauf genommen wird. Jene, die sich gelegentlich in England verlustieren, sollten sich in jedem Fall mit der Diskussion vertraut machen.


This was written and distributed by Catherine Stephens from the IUSW.

We are halfway through the Policing and Crime Bill's journey through Parliament, the
Home Secretary has introduced the first legislation on prostitution that targets
violence and coercion rather than consensual sex work.

Tomorrow, the Scrutiny Committee report on the Policing and Crime Bill is presented
to the House of Commons, and the Bill receives its third reading. Only one day of
parliamentary time has been allotted for this ? an astonishingly small amount of
time for a large bill: there are 77 clauses, which cover police accountability and
effectiveness, alcohol regulation, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and airport
security as well as sections 13-20 on prostitution.

We?ve already changed the Bill vastly for the better. The Home Secretary has lodged
an amendment that limits criminalisation of clients to those who pay for sex with
someone subjected to force etc.? not those of us who are 'controlled for gain?
(i.e., use a third party to find clients). This government say this should still be
a strict liability offence (strict liability is used for things like parking
tickets, and ignorance is no defence against charges of sex with someone underage).

However, in the past few days, new clauses and amendments have been introduced by
other MPs that could improve things even further.

Debate doesn?t start till 2pm on Tuesday. Call your MP Tuesday morning on 020 7219 3000
and ask them to support new clauses and amendments that prioritise the safety of
people in the sex industry, and decrease our criminalisation. Ask your MP to support
? new clause 4 which decriminalises anyone under 18 who is selling sex, this clause
still makes it illegal to buy sex from an under 18, as it should be, but allows
under 18s an unblemished record and ways out of prostitution. A police record is a
sure way to keep them working as prostitutes.
? new clause 37 which defines a brothel as more than two people selling sex plus a maid
? new clause 38 which decriminalises ?associated workers? (e.g., maids) in brothels
? amendment 6 to clause 15 which defines persistently for street sex workers as
?twice a week? rather than the current ?twice in three months?
? amendment 7, which removes clause 16 (compulsory rehabilitation for street sex
workers as a substitute for fines or jail time)
? new clauses 25 and 26, which, like the government amendments, require that the
person selling sex has been coerced and that the client knows this.


The more we put pressure on our MPs, the more likely they are to speak against
dangerous legislation and vote to make us safer. It also means that we?ll have an
easier time of changing things for the better when the Bill goes to the House of
Lords (probably in June). There?s still a long tough fight ahead of us, and the
government majority will carry the day tomorrow, but intervention now will make a
difference.

Although the IUSW is very limited by resources ? we have no office space and all
work is done by volunteers, usually paying expenses out of their own pockets ? we
are beginning to persuade those who have power over us that people in the sex
industry matter and that we can and should be consulted about the decisions which
will affect us.

The IUSW has been closely involved in developments so far. We?ve met with a dozen
MPs and Lords, and begun to be accepted as part of the group of organisations to be
consulted on sex work and issues around it (e.g., we were invited to attend the Home
Affairs Select Committee launch of their report on Human Trafficking). Furthermore,
we?re building links with a range of institutions that influence the conditions in
which we work and the consequences of our criminalisation ? for example, senior
civil servants, local government policy makers, the Bar Council, the Crown
Prosecution Service, police officers of various forces, non governmental
organisations that work on this issue or may develop policies on sex work, etc..



Diskussion auf Punterlink dazu hier:
t=17915http://www.punternet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=17915
love people, use things - not the other way round

Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »


Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Aufklärung für Politiker

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »

Veranstaltung mit Sexworkern im Parlament

Invitation to a UK parliamentary event - all welcome



The UK All Party Parliamentary Group on Debt, Aid and Trade, the Institute of Development Studies Sexuality and Development Programme and the Realising Rights Research Programme Consortium are co-sponsoring an event in the House of Commons – please find the invitation attached.



‘Strange Bedfellows? Sex and International Development’

HIV/AIDS takes millions of lives each year and health complications around sex, reproduction and pregnancy are among the leading causes of death among women in developing countries. Health issues related to sexuality are beginning to be recognised by international development actors. But there is less acknowledgement of the role that pressure to conform to norms around sexuality plays in influencing well-being. Lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, transgender and intersex people, sex workers, single women, women who have sex outside of marriage and non-macho men may face not only pressure to conform, but stigma, discrimination and violence if they do not.

This meeting offers an exciting opportunity to explore the ways in which poverty reduction efforts and work on sexuality and sexual rights intersect with a view to improved policy and programming.



Featuring:

Susie Jolly,
Institute of Development Studies, speaking on the links between poverty and sexuality with recommendations for the upcoming UK Government policy on maternal, sexual and reproductive health

Xiaopei He,
Pink Space, Sexuality Research Centre, Beijing, on how her NGO has conducted innovative programming with sexual minorities in China

Ruth Morgan Thomas,
Global Network of Sex Work Projects/Paulo Longo Research Initiative, talking about the links between development and sex workers rights and wellbeing

Felicity Daly,
Interact Worldwide, on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender issues in UK Government international development policy



WHEN: Wednesday 1st July, 17.00 – 19.00

WHERE: Palace of Westminster, Room CR19

RSVP: Email Charlie Matthews (c.matthews@ids.ac.uk)

DOWNLOAD A PRINTABLE INVITATION (pdf): http://plri.files.wordpress.com/2009/06 ... ation1.pdf





.

Benutzeravatar
Ariane
PlatinStern
PlatinStern
Beiträge: 1330
Registriert: 14.03.2008, 12:01
Wohnort: Berlin
Ich bin: ehemalige SexarbeiterIn

Re: Künstler unterstützen Sexworker

Beitrag von Ariane »

          Bild
Marc of Frankfurt hat geschrieben:Author Sebastian Horsley at the Sex Workers demonstration
at Eros Fountain, Piccadilly Circus, London - 31. März 2009
Für Sebastian Horsley Fans habe ich Montag Abend in Berlin ein Foto von ihm gemacht. Leider ist mein Mitschnitt zur Lesung - aus seinem nun ins deutsche übersetzte Buch "Dandy of the Underground" - nach Konvertierung und Upload auf meinen Server irgendwie mißlungen. Sorry die Technik :017

Bild

[stream]http://arianeescort.com/sh-mitschnitt.mp3[/stream]
love people, use things - not the other way round

Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Gegen Vertreibung

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »

Sexworker-Parade zum Dank an die Anwohner im Rotlichtviertel Soho, London

Soho sex workers thank residents


Sex worker in soho
The parade was followed by music, dance and stand-up comedy

Masked sex workers have paraded through Soho in central London to thank local people for their support in fighting plans to evict them from the area.

Police closed two flats in Dean Street in February, claiming they encouraged anti-social behaviour.

But the sex workers and local residents later won a court decision to have the properties reopened.

The parade had been organised by the Soho Working Girls and English Collective of Prostitutes.

The organisations say most working flats are small, women-run ventures that offer greater safety, companionship and lower running expenses.

They claim it is 10 times safer than working on the streets.

The parade was followed by music, dance and stand-up comedy.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/engl ... 157924.stm





.

Benutzeravatar
Arum
verifizierte UserIn
verifizierte UserIn
Beiträge: 961
Registriert: 01.06.2009, 13:35
Wohnort: Niederländische Grenzregion
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Beitrag von Arum »

<b>U.K. Mobile Companies' Help Sought in Prostitution Crackdown</b>


London is seeking the help of mobile-phone operators to deactivate lines used to promote prostitution as part of a clean-up ahead of the 2012 Olympics.

Chief executive officers of "the major mobile operators" have been invited by the London Mayor's Office to a meeting in October with police, judicial representatives, BT Group Plc and women's organizations in an effort to bar "pimps and traffickers" from mobile networks, the office said in an e- mailed statement.

Criminal gangs often advertise prostitution using cards with mobile-phone numbers that are placed in phone booths in central London. London plans to spend about 9.3 billion pounds ($15.2 billion) on preparations for the 2012 games.

"In 2012 we want to be proud of our city as a glittering example to the world," Deputy Mayor for Policing Kit Malthouse said in the statement. "We want companies like Vodafone, Orange, O2, 3, Virgin and T-Mobile to make it difficult for the pimps and traffickers."

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... cFzDMHIQ7Q
Guten Abend, schöne Unbekannte!

Joachim Ringelnatz

Benutzeravatar
Arum
verifizierte UserIn
verifizierte UserIn
Beiträge: 961
Registriert: 01.06.2009, 13:35
Wohnort: Niederländische Grenzregion
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Beitrag von Arum »

<B>From prostitute to legal secretary</b>



Just over a year ago Jo was a prostitute in Northampton.

She faced daily abuse and violence and had been badly beaten by customers.

Her four children had all been taken away from her and she was addicted to crack cocaine after seven years of selling sex.

Today she is finally free of drugs, off the streets and due to start a course to train as a legal secretary.

She credits her change in fortune to local organisation Sex Workers Around Northampton (Swan), which aims to get female sex workers off the street.

In the past five years, Swan - funded by several partners, including Northamptonshire County Council, the primary care trust and drug support groups - has encouraged between 120 to 150 women like Jo to give up prostitution.

Zum Weiterlesen: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8130368.stm
Guten Abend, schöne Unbekannte!

Joachim Ringelnatz

Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »

Polizistin arbeitete gleichzeitig als Escort

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/engl ... 249369.stm

Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »

4 Positionen gegenübergestellt:

Should prostitution be given the red light?



Published on 20 Sep 2009
http://www.heraldscotland.com/comment/g ... t-1.920882


Plans are afoot to make it a crime to buy sex in Scotland. Is this the way forward? Ahead of a major debate on the proposal, we present five spirited arguments

The feminist campaigner

By Julie bindel




The laws on prostitution are not working. Currently, women are criminalised, making it more difficult to leave prostitution, and the men who pay for sex, at least in brothels, remain unchallenged. Not surprisingly, demand for sexual services has increased. Why does this matter? That depends on whether you believe in equality between men and women. Prostitution creates and maintains the sexual subordination of women. As long as men can buy women’s bodies we can never be equal. So Labour’s expected amendment to the Criminal Justice and Licensing Bill (Scotland), which would make it a crime to buy sex, would be welcome.

Why should brothels be seen as an accepted and respectable part of the leisure industry, knowing the abuse and misery involved? The women are seen as merchandise and marketed as though they are sub-human. Look at the following “offers” available in London brothels: “House special – £80 for 20 minutes with two girls”; “Voucher for first-timers: 50% off next visit”; “£150 for as many times as you can”.

Why would anyone, aside from pimps and other profiteers, support this vile industry? Many do so under the guise of claiming to represent women involved in prostitution. The International Union of Sex Workers (IUSW) behaves far more as a lobby group for the sex industry than an organisation focused on labour rights. In calling for the criminalisation of demand I am more interested in deterrence than punishment. Laws can change attitudes. Legalisation and decriminalisation lead us to believe that buying and selling bodies is acceptable. In countries such as the Netherlands and Australia, removing legal sanctions from pimps and brothel-owners results in a dramatic increase in the number of women and girls trafficked into those countries and an increase in the legal and illegal aspects of the sex industry.

The Netherlands is a perfect example. Half of Amsterdam’s prostitute windows have now been closed down to protect the city from gangs of traffickers, drug dealers and peddlers in child pornography. A report by former prostitute Karina Schaapman, now a member of the city council, described a police file of 80 violent pimps, of whom only three were Dutch-born. She says more than three-quarters of the city’s 8000 to 11,000 prostitutes were from Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia.

The sex industry lobbyists have recently gone silent about the Netherlands and instead are hailing New Zealand – where the sex industry has been decriminalised – as the perfect model. The NZ government’s own report into the effects of decriminalisation reveals that all is not well since the policy shift. When interviewed, most of the women in prostitution said they felt that the law could do little about violence. Some 35% reported in 2007 that they had been coerced to prostitute in the past year, and most felt decriminalisation made no difference to the violence of punters. And allowing brothels to operate without hassle from the police did not reduce street prostitution. In Auckland it more than doubled in just one year.

Men will not experience harm if they are prevented from paying for sex, and don’t believe that those unable to find a “release” for sexual frustration will be forced to rape. But a new argument, thought up by sex industry lobbyists, markets prostitution as a social and charitable service. Disabled men, the argument goes, can’t have sex the usual way, or find a partner, so have to engage the services of “sex workers”. An organisation called Tender Loving Care is campaigning for wheelchair-accessible brothels “to meet the demand” and says hospices should provide for “visiting sex workers”. How insulting to suggest that disabled men can only find a sexual partner by paying for it.

Men who pay for sex need to be educated about the harm it is causing. Some will only stop if they are frightened of the consequences. Others are able to justify what they do, because it is not against the law. One regular punter told me: “It’s like going for a drink. You are not doing anything illegal.” He is right. Let’s hope we can change this.



Julie Bindel is a journalist and feminist campaigner who has written extensively about prostitution



The sex worker

by Catherine Stephens




It may seem morally satisfying to say “let’s attack the men”, but criminalising those who buy sex has harmful consequences for women on the street. Kerb-crawling crackdowns always lead to increased violence against women, who avoid the police by working in unfamiliar, more isolated and dangerous places. Fewer clients means greater competition so women must spend longer on the streets to earn the same money, and are less likely to support each other, for instance by taking car numbers. Some end up working in crack houses, exchanging sex for drugs rather than money.

All this has knock-on negative effects for the communities of which these women are a part. I want to see policies that prioritise the safety and human rights of people in the sex industry, and solutions that actually challenge social exclusion. Politicians bewail our social exclusion as a harmful consequence of our work, but perpetuate it themselves. In Sweden, the consultation about criminalising men explicitly excluded women who sell sex, on the basis that anyone who is comfortable about doing this job is so profoundly psychologically damaged that their opinion shouldn’t be listened to. As a lifelong feminist, I think it’s dangerous to use a woman’s sexual behaviour to undermine the validity of what she says about her experience.

It’s said that women who have sex to earn money for drugs don’t have a choice over what they do, but you wouldn’t say that about somebody who ripped off your car stereo to pay for heroin. To suggest that certain groups of women don’t have the right to choose when they consent to sex, and that their consent is invalid, is extremely dangerous and anyone saying that isn’t listening to people who work in the sex industry. Certainly, there are some who don’t want to be doing this job, and people who are only doing it for the money. And it’s true that it can pay really well. In any other job, I’d be lucky to earn a tenth of the hourly rate that I charge.



But my own experience after 10 years in the industry has been really positive. I’ve worked in brothels, for escort agencies and independently. I’ve never experienced violence or had a client who didn’t respect my boundaries in terms of what I’ll agree to do. The disrespect I’ve experienced has been from people who say my work is disgusting, and who question my right to consent to it. Being stigmatised has a negative effect on people’s mental health, and recent research showed that many within the industry feel threatened not by clients, but by exposure to stigma. (Partly for this reason, the International Union of Sex Workers campaigns to have violence against sex workers classified as hate crime.)

Criminalisation already denies women any protection under the law. Article 20 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights says everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association, but we don’t. If two of us are working in a building, the building’s owner can be arrested for running a brothel. Violent gangs target brothels on the basis that they’re unlikely to be reported, because victims are scared of being arrested.

Decriminalisation does not mean a complete absence of regulation. In New Zealand, brothels are categorised into different sizes, and there are regulations about how close they can be to schools or churches.

All we want is the same human, civil and labour rights, as well as the same protection under the law, as everyone else. We also want to be consulted on the decisions that affect us. It’s considered acceptable to exclude and marginalise people in the sex industry in a way that wouldn’t be tolerated with any other occupation or minority. That’s immoral.



Catherine Stephens is a sex worker and an activist with the International Union of Sex Workers



The academic

by Roger Matthews




Most street prostitutes are victims: usually drug-users who have health and housing problems and have been seduced, coerced and pressured into prostitution at a young age: about 50% became involved aged under 18.

We must also develop effective exiting strategies. A large percentage of women say that, given the chance, they’d like to get out, but prosecuting women for soliciting ties them up in the cycle of fines, courts and perhaps prison, which works against the objective of trying to help people move out of prostitution.

A decade ago, between 1200 and 1400 women were reported to be working in prostitution in Glasgow. The guestimate now is around 150. That’s a massive drop, partly due to various agencies helping women to leave the trade. Those strategies have been effective.

In Sweden, criminalising the purchase rather than the sale of sex has led to a moral shift in attitudes and values. Young teenage males in Stockholm will tell you it’s not acceptable to buy sexual services. Obviously Swedish norms and social structures are different from ours, but there is a growing mood north and south of the Border that some problemetisation of demand must take place.

The argument that prostitution is “the oldest profession” and will never be eradicated is often used as a rationalisation for doing nothing. But the parallel argument – that we’ve always had violence so it’s pointless trying to reduce or remove it – wouldn’t be tolerated. In Glasgow, we could, through effective exit strategies and decriminalising soliciting, pretty well eradicate street prostitution, a reasonable and desirable objective.

Most street prostitutes are not having a good time. Terms such as “sex worker” and “working woman” are euphemisms and avoid the reality of prostitution. It is very different from being a lapdancer or talking on a telephone sex line.

My book, Prostitution, Politics and Policy (Routledge-Cavendish), includes a quote from a working woman who says engaging in prostitution is like being paid to be raped. That’s a salient phrase.

It’s misleading to represent prostitution as a career choice. Choice plays little part. Many came in through drug addiction, one-third have been in local authority care, a large percentage come from broken families, often with sexual abuse or neglect. These young women are very effectively targeted by pimps and people who exploit their vulnerability. In fact, women get involved in street prostitution when they’ve run out of choices.

Tolerance zones become magnets for drug dealers, users, exploiters, and provide no protection for the women because they still go to parks to actually have sex, and so are still vulnerable.

The answer is to decriminalise soliciting, while ensuring that the exploiters are subject to more intense criminal sanctions. Women who work on the street are more victims than criminals. We need to help them to get out of prostitution and turn their lives around.



Professor Roger Matthews is director of the Crime Reduction and Community Safety Research Unit at London South Bank University



The Politician

by Margo MacDonald




There’s a lot of confused thinking about this subject. Understandably, people don’t want to think of anybody being in the position where that’s all they’ve got to sell. But it’s wicked of legislators to simply pretend it doesn’t happen.

It’s worth asking what “selling sex” actually means. What constitutes a sale? Does money have to change hands? What if someone is taken for a nice meal then afterwards there’s an exchange of favours – is that sex for sale? Does barter come into it? Legislating for human behaviour on this level is impossible.

Criminalising those who pay for sex sounds good, because it was always inequitable that women were punished and men weren’t. When the Swedes outlawed the purchase of sex, the women went underground and everybody worried because they didn’t know what was happening to them. There was also a lot of trafficking into Sweden at that time, and now the women have drifted back on to the streets. Criminalising men who purchase sex won’t work and wouldn’t necessarily be desirable if no third party is being adversely affected.

The argument that prostitution can’t be tolerated because it’s paid-for rape is nonsense. If someone joins an escort agency then decides to sell extras after the evening’s escorting, agrees a price and sex is purchased discreetly so she goes home and pays her bills, that is not rape.

Despite all the praise for the work Glasgow has done in helping people “exit” prostitution, I’ve seen no statistics to show they actually assisted many women to move on. To genuinely help, you must accept that they may take several years to decide to change their lives, meanwhile building up a relationship of trust by providing non-judgemental support. In Edinburgh until last spring, SCOT-PEP – the Scottish Prostitutes Education Project – was contracted to provide that kind of service. So if a woman came in for a cup of tea at the drop-in centre near the red light district where she worked and said, “I want out of this”, someone could say, “Well, here’s some information about pre-employment training, because you’ll need skills to get back into work.”

The frightening thing about this debate is that we don’t actually know what’s happening to the women involved. Organisations like SCOT-PEP worked with health authorities and police to ensure everyone knew what was going on. We don’t have that sort of contact now, so vulnerable women who are forced to sell sex – about whom everyone is so worried – have been made a lot more vulnerable.

I’d love to think that nobody had to sell sex, but I know that some people will want to do so and some people will want to buy. It’s the way they do it that we should concern ourselves with, and if they’re discreet and not harming third parties, what is the legislation for?



Margo MacDonald is an independent MSP



The police watchdog

by Bill Kelly




We don’t need more legislation – there are plenty of existing laws on everything from brothel-keeping to soliciting, kerb crawling and trafficking. Criminalisation is not the answer – either for those who buy or sell sex, and I wouldn’t support the Swedish model. Instead, society has to recognise that there is a sex industry that needs to be regulated. Traditional thinking on sex work is outmoded, being focused almost entirely on street prostitution when, in fact, the transaction takes place in many different ways and is a huge commercial enterprise.

The escort agency and sauna sector alone was recently valued at a £0.5 billion, which is similar to the cinema industry. So the commerce involved is huge. You have to ask what the net gain of criminalising this industry would be, and how you would enforce it.

The public needs to make choices about where it wants police energies to be focused. Introducing an unworkable criminal statute would simply divert resources away from protecting the vulnerable, and from pursuing other more pressing demands.

Having led the Operation Pentameter investigation into sex trafficking in Scotland, I know that there is a serious problem around enforced prostitution. But you can’t assume that everyone in the industry is there because of coercion, and moralising the argument by saying that no-one working in the industry could be doing so of their own free will detracts from efforts to protect the vulnerable.

Research into men who buy sex shows that in the sex industry, there are those who are oppressed and vulnerable and those who are not. In human rights terms, you have to be careful that you don’t lose some rights to try and support others.

It’s far better to simplify this debate by taking out the moralising and asking who’s at most risk of harm, then targeting your efforts in helping them. By and large, the most vulnerable tend to be those working in street prostitution, who are often involved in drug addiction or oppressive relationships, and those trafficked into off-street brothels.

Within the past decade, there have been more than 100 murders of street-walkers, and if you take the view that protecting vulnerable women is a priority then you have to support anything that would provide them with more safety: so tolerance zones should be tried.

As for the argument that people simply shouldn’t be allowed to trade in human misery, well, that’s certainly relevant where trafficking is concerned, so that’s where policing should be concentrated.

People are already being brought to justice and I don’t think creating another offence would add any value, so no, I wouldn’t support any move to criminalise men who purchase sex. As far as I am concerned, it is about protecting the most vulnerable from harm.



Bill Skelly is HM Inspector of Constabulary for Scotland





.

Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Aufruf und Unterschriftensammlung

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »

URGENT: DEMONSTRATION - SEX WORKERS NEED SAFETY AND RIGHTS, NOT CRIMINALISATION



:: urgent: to be distributed to all networks and allies::
:: please sign on to the statement below with your name and organisation ::



SEX WORKERS NEED SAFETY AND RIGHTS, NOT CRIMINALISATION

Demonstration Against the Policing and Crime Bill

12-2pm, Tuesday 3 November, Parliament Square


Bild


Bring placards and red umbrella's and join the demonstration to demand:
  • an end to the criminalisation of sex work
  • safety and other rights for all workers in the sex industry, including the right to unionise
  • the right to stay and not be deported
  • the right not to have a criminal record so we can apply for other jobs
  • decent wages and benefits for all so that we can refuse violence and exploitation in any industry


If passed the Policing and Crime Bill will push prostitution further underground and sex workers into more danger. It would increase arrests against street workers, introduce compulsory ‘rehabilitation’ under threat of imprisonment, close premises where sex workers work together in relative safety, boost police powers to seize worker's hard won earnings, and reduce rape against prostitute women to a lesser offence while criminalising clients who may not be guilty.

The government justifies their latest clamp down with claims that prostitution is rape and that most sex workers have been trafficked. Instead of enabling victims of violence to come forward, they victimise and criminalise women working in the sex industry. Most violent men, including bosses who profit from exploiting 'illegal' workers in the agricultural, domestic and sex industry, will continue to get away with it, while sex workers working together, especially migrant women, will be raided, imprisoned and deported.

At the same time the Welfare Reform Bill proposes to abolish Income Support and drive all claimants into work or to ‘work for their benefits’ i.e. £1.60 an hour. Many are already being asked to scab on postal workers by applying for their jobs. Those who won’t or can’t manage on slave wages and decide to work in the sex industry risk being criminalised and consequently denied entry into other work in the future.

We are mothers and grandmothers supporting loved ones, young people keeping a roof over our heads and getting some independence, migrants sending money home, asylum seekers made destitute by immigration laws that deny us both support and the right to work, students paying for our education, women or men who can’t get jobs in the recession or want a better standard of living.

Like any other workers, some of us like our jobs, many don’t. But we all know the difference between forced and consenting sex, whether in a relationship, casual or paid for. Most people support the decriminalisation of prostitution so women can work more safely. But, as with privatisation and everything else, the government ignores the workers and the public; they only listen to the ‘experts’ they fund to sing to their tune.

Whatever our situation we need rights & safety, not criminalisation.

Catch rapists and exploiters, not clients.




Organised by:

English Collective of Prostitutes
www.prostitutesCollective.net

International Union of Sex Workers
www.iusw.org

x:talk project:
www.xtalkproject.net



Supported by:

(please add your name and organization)

Bitte hier drunter posten, dann senden wir es morgen weiter





.
Zuletzt geändert von Marc of Frankfurt am 01.11.2009, 14:09, insgesamt 1-mal geändert.

Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Unterstützung

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »

Marc of Frankfurt, sex worker, admin www.sexworker.at - sex work information clearing house in the German internet - est. 2005

Benutzeravatar
Aoife
Senior Admin
Senior Admin
Beiträge: 7067
Registriert: 20.09.2008, 21:37
Wohnort: Ludwigshafen am Rhein
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Beitrag von Aoife »

Aoife Swane, Germany, Ludwigshafen am Rhein - sex worker, sexual healer, safer sex educator
It's not those who inflict the most, but those who endure the most, who will conquer. MP.Vol.Bobby Sands
'I know kung fu, karate, and 37 other dangerous words'
Misspellings are *very special effects* of me keyboard

Benutzeravatar
Zwerg
Senior Admin
Senior Admin
Beiträge: 18072
Registriert: 15.06.2006, 19:26
Wohnort: 1050 Wien
Ich bin: engagierter Außenstehende(r)

Beitrag von Zwerg »

christian knappik, Vienna - Austria, admin sexworker.at

Benutzeravatar
Marc of Frankfurt
SW Analyst
SW Analyst
Beiträge: 14095
Registriert: 01.08.2006, 14:30
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Beitrag von Marc of Frankfurt »

Hier die Diskussion mit den Bloggenden Lords:
http://lordsoftheblog.net/2009/10/29/pr ... crime-bill
wo viele sexwork aktivisten sich beteiligt haben.



Ihr könnt hier heute nacht noch weitere Unterschriften posten:

Benutzeravatar
Sinamore
unverzichtbar
unverzichtbar
Beiträge: 153
Registriert: 30.07.2009, 20:57
Wohnort: Zürich
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Beitrag von Sinamore »

Sina, Switzerland, Zurich, Sex worker.

JennyHN
- jetzt: Ruhepol_OF -
Beiträge: 774
Registriert: 27.12.2006, 10:27
Wohnort: Offenbach/Main
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Beitrag von JennyHN »

JennyHN, Offenbach, Germany - Moderatorin des Sexworker.at, Vorstandsmitglied des Sexworker Verein e.V., Sexworker und Sexualbegleiterin
Polygamie ist nicht unmoralisch.
Aber das Vertrauen und die Gesundheit liebender Partner zu mißbrauchen, schon....

Benutzeravatar
Aoife
Senior Admin
Senior Admin
Beiträge: 7067
Registriert: 20.09.2008, 21:37
Wohnort: Ludwigshafen am Rhein
Ich bin: Keine Angabe

Beitrag von Aoife »

Hier noch eine britische Petition, die in unserem Sinn ist, online unterschreibbar: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/spec ... ingunit/?e

Liebe Grüße, Aoife
It's not those who inflict the most, but those who endure the most, who will conquer. MP.Vol.Bobby Sands
'I know kung fu, karate, and 37 other dangerous words'
Misspellings are *very special effects* of me keyboard